🔗 Share this article

Families of people laid to rest in graves vulnerable to coastal erosion say that a lack of decision on how best to address the problem is creating avoidable anguish about the eternal homes of their departed family.

A Looming Threat to Historic Graveyards

The council have singled out three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being swallowed by the sea in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the issue sets out a series of possible actions, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and relocating them in more secure sites. Officials say it is for local people to decide how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. They wanted this to serve as their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates indicate at least a portion of one churchyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Past

A local business owner recalled a school trip to the nearby village of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the sea, along with its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that the deceased will just get washed out to the ocean. They won’t. People will collect remains as mementos and go grave robbing in search of treasures. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the same thing that befell at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Peril

Along the coast lies the burial plot of a former paratrooper who died while serving abroad. His mother said she could not sleep after discovering her child's final plot might one day be relocated.

“It truly trouble me to think this won’t be his lasting resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an significant place to go.”

In her view, new burials should cease but says it is too soon to exhume existing graves. “My preference for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an early decision needs to be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Seeking Answers and Clarity

An absence of consensus over the timing and method to tackle the problem has left grieving relatives feeling frustrated and worried.

Some want additional sea defences to delay the inevitable erosion and to permit funerals to continue for now. Others contend the moment for relocation is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotional,” said one relative. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And all parties is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A local official confirmed the graveyards were under the care of the local diocese. “In the end it is down to them to decide the direction to take. Our role is here to help support them through that journey with residents.”

It was also stated there was time to consider all the choices. “This concerns many years before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should be done yet. It requires productive community discussions to discover the right answers for each village.”

The prospect of the loss of the churches and graveyards was described as one of “immense sorrow for the area,” but faith leaders also referenced a doctrine in life after death, offering a theological viewpoint on the physical disappearance of sacred ground.